3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS vs FUSION 360
In the world of computer-aided design (CAD) software, two major offerings stand out: 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS and Fusion 360. Both offer powerful tools and features to simplify the design process, but understanding their differences is crucial in selecting the right solution for your specific needs. In this article, we'll compare 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS and Fusion 360, examining their key features, strengths, and ideal use cases to help you make an informed decision.
User Interface and Ease of Use:
3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS has an easy-to-use interface with a recognizable layout and tools for an efficient design process. 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS offers both a local install of the SOLIDWORKS everyone knows and loves paired with cloud-based CAD to fit a variety of needs and providing ultimate flexibility. Named user licensing meets the demands of remote teams and independent contractors by providing collaboration features and cross-platform accessibility.
Fusion 360 has a contemporary UI with cloud-based features, but it's still very user-friendly. It is installed locally but is connected to the cloud requiring an internet connection unless working in offline mode. Fusion 360 also uses named-user licensing, however the software lacks some of the collaboration and PLM features included in the SOLIDWORKS packages.
Design Tools and Capabilities:
3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS offers a comprehensive suite of design tools, including advanced modeling, simulation, and rendering capabilities depending on the package. Its seamless integration with other SOLIDWORKS applications enhances productivity and facilitates a seamless design-to-manufacturing workflow.
When it comes to Fusion 360, the software is less feature-rich and the capabilities are more limited. Extensions are features that you "unlock" by paying for within the application to add additional capabilities. While some value this flexibility, others find it difficult to switch between different subscription rates.
Performance and Scalability:
Performance and scalability are two areas in which 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS shines, especially for complicated assemblies and large-scale projects. Because of its strong architecture, it can handle complex designs and lengthy simulations with ease, which makes it appropriate for enterprise-level applications. Also, when it comes to PLM extended tools can be easily added to 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS such as Advanced Change Management and BOM Management.
Fusion 360 does not provide extended tools. Fusion generally will be sufficient for small to medium-sized applications, and their scalability is further enhanced by cloud-based processing capacity. For larger assemblies or more complicated designs, it will not perform as well as 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS.
Cost and Licensing Options:
3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS is sold as an annual subscription, which offers licensing options that may be customized to meet the needs of small and large enterprises alike. For many users, its large feature set and excellent reputation justify the investment. There are also Maker and Startup offers to fit all budgets.
SOLIDWORKS offers other licensing and pricing models with the desktop offering as well, for this blog we are only covering the subscription option.
Fusion’s base cost is lower consistent with the capabilities included. The complete edition can be paid for either yearly or you can make monthly payments. Full access to all workspaces with CAM and CAE features is provided with this subscription. But for Fusion 360, any advanced functions requiring extensions can drive up the price.
Support and Community:
3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS provides a variety of online learning tools. With a larger market reach. SOLIDWORKS is also taught in technical university courses and third-party certification programs are available. Local resellers, online support, and an official forum are some of the troubleshooting options. The User Group community is strong with SOLIDWORKS so it is easy to get plugged in to those groups for community and learning. Plus, when you buy it from a software licensing reseller, you usually get tech support.
In contrast, Fusion 360 lacks the same level of structured support and resources. While Autodesk offers training courses, there is not the same level of community and user group engagement.
2 Scenarios in which you would want to have 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS instead of Fusion 360
Scenario 1:
You work on a team creating an innovative line of ergonomic office chairs that will transform the way people work. Extensive testing and accurate engineering are necessary to guarantee that the chair's design is both long-lasting and relaxing. To improve the design of a chair for maximum comfort and durability, you can quickly create detailed 3D models, simulate various seating scenarios, and analyze stress areas with 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS. Additionally, team members may communicate easily thanks to the platform's collaboration features, which streamlines the design process from creation to production.
Scenario 2:
As a freelance industrial designer, you're engaged in a project to build a cycling shop with personalized bicycle frames. In addition to being visually appealing, your designs must be solid structurally and customized to meet the needs of every rider. You can use 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS' advanced modeling tools to accurately achieve your artistic ideas. With 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS, you can customize frame geometry and optimize material selection to produce custom bicycle frames that surpass your clients' expectations. Additionally, you may virtually test your designs with its integrated simulation capabilities, guaranteeing maximum performance on the road.
Bottom Line:
Although 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS and Fusion 360 both provide strong CAD and design tools and functionality, each provides specific advantages and best practices. 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS is the best option for users who need cloud-based collaboration, smooth integration within the SOLIDWORKS ecosystem, and powerful simulation capabilities. Fusion 360 can be a good starting point but many professional users run into limitations as they get farther into the design process. The choice between the two ultimately comes down to your unique needs, financial constraints, and long-term objectives.